<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is I-3 Necessary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coastalsense.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/is-i-3-necessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coastalsense.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/is-i-3-necessary/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics and the way things work (or don't) in coastal Georgia</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: drjay</title>
		<link>http://coastalsense.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/is-i-3-necessary/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>drjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalsense.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/is-i-3-necessary/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>it would be nice to have a direct inland route for port traffic that does not involve 1st using 95 or heading through atl.  the route to greenville seems reasonble--knoxville was better b/c it got trucks to I40</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be nice to have a direct inland route for port traffic that does not involve 1st using 95 or heading through atl.  the route to greenville seems reasonble&#8211;knoxville was better b/c it got trucks to I40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
